1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 458 Pa.
  5. 458 Pa. 97 (1974)
 

HENDERSON v. HENDERSON

458 Pa. 97 (1974)

Henderson v. Henderson, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 16, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter C. Paul, with him Rawle & Henderson, for appellant.

Samuel F. Pepper, for appellee.

James M. Marsh, with him LaBrum and Doak, for interested party.

Barbara A. Brown, Harriet N. Katz, Ann E. Freedman, and Women's Law Project, for Women in Transition and ERA Law Center, interested parties.

Kathleen Herzog Larkin and Lawrence Silver, Deputy Attorneys General, and Israel Packel, Attorney General, for amicus curiae.

Before JONES, C.J., EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION PER CURIAM, October 16, 1974:

This is one of three appeals that have been consolidated for the purposes of argument to determine the consistency of current legislative enactments with the recently passed Article I, Section 28 of the Pennsylvania Constitution known as the Equal Rights Amendment.1 This particular appeal raises the question whether the Act of May 2, 1929, P.L. 1237, § 46, as amended, 23 P.S. § 46...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases