1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 521 P.2d
  5. 521 P.2d 15 (1974)
 

STATE v. HOLLOWELL

521 P.2d 15 (1974)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Arthur James HOLLOWELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 15, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Reeder, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and TANZER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court's giving of two instructions to the jury, contending that there was no evidence to support them. He does not dispute their accuracy. One of the instructions, which related to the lawfulness of defense of property by the victim, was based on ORS 161.229. The other instruction, regarding out-of-court statements made by defendant, was Oregon State Bar Uniform Jury Instruction No. 204.01, which is based on ORS 17...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases