1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 499 F.2d
  5. 499 F.2d 36 (1974)
 

UNITED STATES v. LEDESMA

Nos. 73-1583, 73-1582.

499 F.2d 36 (1974)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jim Ladesma [LEDESMA], Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Oscar Venicio QUIROZ-SANTI, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 21, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha Goldin (argued), Alan Saltzman, of Saltzman & Goldin, Hollywood, Cal., for appellant in 73-1583.

Michael Kenney, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee in 73-1583.

Carl E. Stewart (argued), of Eilers, Stewart, Pangman & Millar, Newport Beach, Cal., for appellant in 73-1582.

Michael Kenney, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), D. Henry Thayer, Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Attys., William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., for appellee in 73-1582.

Before HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.

OPINION

ALFRED T. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Jim Ledesma and Oscar Venicio Quiroz-Santi appeal their convictions for conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and for possessing, with intent to distribute, cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). They assert errors in the admission of evidence and also seek reversals for insufficiency of the evidence. We affirm both convictions.

In November, 1972, Nancy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases