VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant's exceptions to allowing the victim of his crime to identify him at trial are without merit. The evidence supports the court's findings, after voir dire, to the effect that the identification of defendant by the victim was based solely on what the victim saw at the time of the robbery. The court's findings which are supported by competent evidence are conclusive. State v. Taylor,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.