1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 382 F.Supp.
  5. 382 F.Supp. 143 (1974)
 

VAUGHN v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION

Civ. A. Nos. 4-71262, 4-71263.

382 F.Supp. 143 (1974)

Albert VAUGHN, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant. Vernon A. PRANGE, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

April 30, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Haynes, Haynes & Donnelly, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

A. William Rolf, Detroit, Mich., for defendant Chrysler.

Douglas E. Cutler, Dearborn, Mich., for defendant Ford.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

KAESS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs' complaints read in the most favorable light, each set forth the same three claims: violation of a property or contract right, denial of due process, and age discrimination. Each defendant has brought a Motion to Dismiss, and defendant Chrysler Corporation brings, in the alternative, a Motion for Summary Judgment. Because of the almost identical wording of the complaints and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases