1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 377 F.Supp.
  5. 377 F.Supp. 144 (1974)
 

UNITED STATES v. BRUMAGE

No. 72 CR 904.

377 F.Supp. 144 (1974)

UNITED STATES of America v. Kenneth BRUMAGE et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

April 11, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward John Boyd, V, Acting U. S. Atty., E.D.N.Y. by Guy L. Heinemann, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Howard L. Jacobs, P. C., New York City, for defendant Kenneth Brumage.

Martin & Obermaier, New York City by John S. Martin, Jr., New York City, for defendant Fairmont Electronic Sales Corp.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

Defendants Fairmont Electronic Sales Corporation ("Fairmont") and Kenneth Brumage, a corporate official, have moved to dismiss ten counts of a nineteen count indictment, contending that the statute alleged to have been violated, § 6(b) of the Export Administration Act of 1969 ("the Act"), 50 U.S.C. App. § 2405(b), is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons which follow, defendants' motion is denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases