HEFLIN, Chief Justice.
The major holdings of this case are as follows:
1. The tests set forth in Miller v. California,
2. With the Miller engraftments the 1961 Alabama obscenity statute is constitutional as applied in the context of the instant case.
3. Contemporary community standards...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.