1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 210 S.E.2d
  5. 210 S.E.2d 280 (1974)
 

STATE v. STUNTZ

No. 7429SC850.

210 S.E.2d 280 (1974)

24 N.C. App. 267

STATE of North Carolina v. Leah Jane STUNTZ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 18, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. James H. Carson, Jr., by Associate Atty. Jesse C. Brake, Raleigh, for the State.

Hamrick & Bowen by James M. Bowen, Rutherfordton, for defendant appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant contends that insufficient evidence was introduced at the hearing to support the finding by the trial judge that she willfully and without lawful excuse violated the terms and conditions of her probation. We do not agree.

With respect to probation revocation hearings, our Supreme Court, in State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 353, 154 S.E.2d 476, 480 (1967), has stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases