KOWALSKE v. ARMOUR AND COMPANY

No. 44216.

220 N.W.2d 268 (1974)

George W. KOWALSKE, Appellant, v. ARMOUR AND COMPANY, Respondent, Swift and Company and Van Hoven Company, Inc., Defendants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 28, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cochrane & Bresnahan, James G. Roban, and John A. Cochrane, St. Paul, for appellant.

Mahoney, Dougherty, Angell & Mahoney, Richard P. Mahoney, and John F. Angell, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard before SHERAN, C.J., and OTIS, SCOTT, and KNUTSON, JJ., and considered and decided by the court.


KNUTSON, Justice.*

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff's post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Plaintiff, George W. Kowalske, was employed by Donovan Construction Company during the spring of 1966 in moving a high tension electric line which was located on a dike bordering the Mississippi River in order to permit another contractor to replace the dike. The line extended for about one mile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases