Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Judicial Department on March 26, 1962. He was charged in this proceeding with professional misconduct in that he represented to a client that he could favorably influence the disposition of a criminal case pending against the client for the sum of $5,000. No formal answer to the charge was filed on behalf of the respondent, although he denied same in an interview with counsel for the Grievance Committee...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.