1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 43 Cal.App.3d
  5. 43 Cal.App.3d 435 (1974)
 

CERTIFICATED EMPLOYEES v. RICHMOND UNIFIED SCH.

Docket No. 32022.

43 Cal.App.3d 435 (1974)

117 Cal. Rptr. 921

CERTIFICATED EMPLOYEES COUNCIL OF THE RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

November 25, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

White, Giambroni & Walters and Francis R. Giambroni for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

John B. Clausen, County Counsel, Arthur W. Walenta, Jr., Assistant County Counsel, and William W. Ward, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BROWN (H.C.), J.

Appellants sought a writ of mandate to set aside respondent's decision changing rules governing employees which had been passed prior to taking the steps required by the Winton Act for resolving persistent disagreements. It is concluded that the object and purpose of the Winton Act would be frustrated if the employer could act before receiving the recommendations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases