1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 63 Wis.2d
  5. 63 Wis.2d 389 (1974)
 

HOLMES v. STATE

No. State 187.

63 Wis.2d 389 (1974)

217 N.W.2d 657

HOLMES, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 7, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Shellow & Shellow and James M. Shellow, attorneys, and Gilda B. Shellow and Harold L. Harlowe of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by James M. Shellow.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

Facts.

Plaintiff in error, Stuart A. Holmes, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was charged with armed robbery (sec. 943.32 (1) (b) and (2), Stats.) and attempted murder (secs. 940.01 and 939.32). Following preliminary hearings and bindovers for trial, the state moved to consolidate the charges for trial, and the motion was granted. Following jury trial, defendant was found guilty on both charges on November 11, 1970, and sentenced to twenty years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases