DUNLAP v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD

Docket No. 17649.

54 Mich. App. 398 (1974)

221 N.W.2d 237

DUNLAP v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided July 23, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Lay and Riseman, Lemke & Piotroski, for plaintiffs.

Sigmund A. Beras, for defendant City of Southfield.

Hartman, Beier, Howlett, McConnell & Googasian, for defendant Rembrandt Enterprises, Incorporated.

Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg (by Laurence D. Connor), for defendant Realty Ventures, Incorporated.

Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and HOLBROOK and DENEWETH, JJ.


DENEWETH, J.

The plaintiffs are Southfield property owners representing a class of residents living in the area of a condominium development proposed by the defendants Realty Ventures and Rembrandt Enterprises (hereinafter referred to as the developers). Plaintiffs' complaint for an order of superintending control against the City of Southfield consisted of five counts. The defendant developers moved for accelerated and summary judgment. The trial court granted the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases