CORRIGAN, J.
Appellant's first contention, as set forth in its proposition of law No. 1, is that the applicants and the Public Utilities Commission failed to strictly adhere to the jurisdictional requirements of R. C. 4921.08 and 4921.09 governing applications for irregular route certificates of public convenience and necessity, and that, therefore, the applications must be dismissed.
Appellant's second contention, as set forth in its propositions of law Nos...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
