1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 373 F.Supp.
  5. 373 F.Supp. 56 (1974)
 

ACKER v. PROVIDENT NATIONAL BANK

Civ. A. No. 72-2343.

373 F.Supp. 56 (1974)

Fred ACKER and Kenneth C. Dabrow, Individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. PROVIDENT NATIONAL BANK and Philadelphia National Bank, all national banking corporations.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

February 27, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Malakoff, Berger & Kapetan, Pittsburgh, Pa., Harold Rosenthal, Rosenthal & Gale, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Robert S. Ryan, Melvin C. Breaux, Drinker Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Provident National Bank.

Gregory M. Harvey, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Phila. National Bank.

OPINION AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

On November 27, 1972, plaintiffs Fred Acker and Kenneth C. Dabrow brought this action individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated against the defendants Provident National Bank and Philadelphia National Bank (hereinafter "Provident" and "PNB" respectively), to recover statutory damages for the alleged violation of the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. §§ 85, 86), the Pennsylvania Goods...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases