1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 319 A.2d
  5. 319 A.2d 99 (1974)
 

MALAK v. MacINTOSH

No. 73-72-Appeal.

319 A.2d 99 (1974)

Maria MALAK v. William D. MacINTOSH.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

May 24, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. McSoley, Jr., Providence, for plaintiff.

Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Kenneth P. Borden, Providence, for defendant.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Both parties have agreed that our decision in Pescatore et al. v. MacIntosh et al., 319 A.2d 21 (R.I.1974), and the subsequent filing of a remittitur as provided therein, have rendered this case moot. Accordingly, the plaintiff's appeal is hereby denied and dismissed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed and the case is remitted to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

ROBERTS, C. J.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases