STATE v. RUSSO


127 N.J. Super. 286 (1974)

317 A.2d 369

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ANTHONY RUSSO, HENRY DE BENEDICTIS, EMIL MENSORIO, PERRY IOMMAZZO, WILLIAM CHIANDUSSE, ARTHUR CORA, RICHARD DAVIDSON, DAVID DE PALMA, DAVID EDELMAN, THOMAS FORMOSO, MICHAEL MULLINS, ANNA NICKAS AND BERNARD TEMEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 26, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Mayer, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Alfred L. Genton, Acting Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Anthony A. Kress argued the cause for respondents Perry Iommazzo and Arthur Cora.

Mr. James D. Checki, Jr. argued the cause for respondent Richard Davidson (Messrs. Checki & Politan, attorneys).

Messrs. Ryan & Sommers, attorneys for respondent Emil Mensorio, join in the brief of respondent Richard Davidson.

Before Judges COLLESTER, LYNCH and MICHELS.


PER CURIAM.

Defendants were indicted for conspiracy to violate the gambling laws and separately indicted for various substantive gambling offenses. The indictments resulted in part from tape recorded conversations following the wiretapping of six telephones during January 1973 which was authorized by the court pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-1 et seq. The conversations were recorded on 57 tapes covering a period of over 102 hours and included both irrelevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases