1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 381 F.Supp.
  5. 381 F.Supp. 29 (1974)
 

MEEROPOL v. NIZER

No. 73 Civ. 2720 HRT.

381 F.Supp. 29 (1974)

Michael MEEROPOL and Robert Meeropol, Plaintiffs, v. Louis NIZER et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

July 31, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedman & Perlin by Marshall Perlin, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon by George Berger and Martin Stein, New York City, for defendant Louis Nizer.

Satterlee & Stephens by Robert M. Callagy and James F. Rittinger, New York City, for defendant Doubleday & Co., Inc.

OPINION

TYLER, District Judge.

Defendants Louis Nizer ("Nizer") and Doubleday & Company, Inc. ("Doubleday") have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., dismissing the second count of the complaint in which plaintiffs Michael Meeropol and Robert Meeropol ("the Meeropols") seek $1,000,000 in damages for alleged defamation and invasion of plaintiffs' privacy by reason of statements appearing in the book entitled The Implosion Conspiracy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases