1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 313 N.E.2d
  5. 313 N.E.2d 95 (1974)
 

PEARSON v. WINFIELD

No. 1-973A158.

313 N.E.2d 95 (1974)

Carl E. PEARSON et al., Appellants (Defendants below), v. William S. WINFIELD and Douglass E. Winfield, Appellees (Plaintiffs below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.

Rehearing Denied August 9, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Len E. Bunger and Don M. Robertson, of Bunger, Harrell & Robertson, Bloomington, for appellants.

Thomas A. Berry and James H. Ferguson, of Ferguson, Berry, Ferguson & Lloyd, Bloomington, for appellees.

LYBROOK, Judge.

Defendants-appellants Carl E. Pearson, Mary Ann Pearson, and Olive C. Beem appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs-appellees William S. and Douglass E. Winfield in an action for reformation of a deed.

The central issue presented for review is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding of mutual mistake and its subsequent grant of reformation.

The following facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases