McCARTY v. F.C. KINGSTON COMPANY

No. 1 CA-CIV 2042.

22 Ariz. App. 17 (1974)

522 P.2d 778

Harold S. McCARTY and Maxine McCarty, his wife, Appellants, v. F.C. KINGSTON COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

Review Denied September 19, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meadow, Cheche, Nastro & Thrasher by Daniel E. Nastro, Phoenix, for appellants.

Shimmel, Hill & Bishop, P.C. by Charles A. Finch, Phoenix, for appellee.


OPINION

OGG, Judge.

The sole issue presented is whether the trial judge committed reversible error in instructing the jury in this negligence case.

The Appellants Harold S. McCarty and Maxine McCarty, hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff, brought this action against the Appellee F.C. Kingston Company, hereinafter referred to as Defendant, for damages sustained by the Plaintiff Harold S. McCarty when he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases