Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, on May 28, 1954. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, he was charged, in essence, with appropriating a client's funds for his own use. The report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report found that the respondent received $5,000 from his client which was to be forwarded as...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.