1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 38 Cal.App.3d
  5. 38 Cal.App.3d 335 (1974)
 

DILLON v. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO.

Docket No. 1765.

38 Cal.App.3d 335 (1974)

113 Cal. Rptr. 396

HENRY DILLON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

April 2, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Coyle & Best, McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Coyle & Wayte and Boone & Monroe and William B. Boone for Defendant and Appellant.

R.W. Levy for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

GARGANO, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County declaring that appellant, hereinafter referred to as Hartford, is obligated to defend respondents, hereinafter referred to as the Dillons, in the case of J.T. Cox v. Henry Dillon, et al, superior court action No. 139735; the complaint in that action was filed on January 6, 1969, in Fresno County.

The background facts are these.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases