McMULLEN v. MARYLAND CAS. CO.


127 N.J. Super. 231 (1974)

317 A.2d 75

MARGARET McMULLEN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES MC MULLEN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. MARGARET MC MULLEN, ADMINISTRATRIX AND ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES MC MULLEN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CONFORTI & EISELE, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Nathan Baker and Morris Schnitzer argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Baker, Garber, Duffy & Baker, attorneys).

Mr. Edward E. Kuebler argued the cause for respondent Maryland Casualty Company.

Before Judges HANDLER, MEANOR and KOLE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MEANOR, J.A.D.

This case brings to us for resolution issues concerning the application of the contingent fee schedule of R. 1:21-7(c) to a tort settlement or judgment against which there is a workmen's compensation lien. The trial court's opinion is reported. McMullen v. Maryland Cas. Co., 123 N.J.Super. 248 (Law Div. 1973). We delayed our decision in this matter to await...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases