STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 4, 1974.
Decided May 6, 1974.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Morgan E. Thomas argued the cause for defendant.
Mr. Robert A. Rubenfeld, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., former Attorney General of New Jersey).
Before Judges CONFORD, HANDLER and MEANOR.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D.
Defendant challenges his conviction of driving 75.3 miles an hour in a 55 m.p.h. zone on U.S. Rt. 322 on May 5, 1973, primarily on the ground that the evidence of his guilt rests solely on a reading of his speed by a VASCAR device operated by a state trooper. The contention is that expert testimony as to the reliability of the device, which was not here presented...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.