RONFRA DEV. CORP. v. PENNINGTON

49101.

131 Ga. App. 195 (1974)

205 S.E.2d 448

RONFRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. PENNINGTON et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 19, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose & Stern, George S. Stern, Benjamin Landey, for appellant.

Hicks & Scroggins, Frank W. Scroggins, Smith, Currie & Hancock, Glower W. Jones, Philip L. Fortune, for appellees.


DEEN, Judge.

1. The contention that Ronfra is entitled to have sums spent for litigation, attorney fees and interest, in defending the owners against Georgia Pacific's claims of lien paid for by the materialman J & J, or set off against what Ronfra owed J & J on account, is without merit. There can be no quantum meruit recovery under Code § 3-107. In addition to other equally good reasons, it should be pointed out that J & J was not a required defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases