1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 222 N.W.2d
  5. 222 N.W.2d 98 (1974)
 

STATE v. SOLEM

No. 44045.

222 N.W.2d 98 (1974)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Thomas Arthur SOLEM, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 27, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hvass, Weisman & King, Si Weisman, and Richard A. Williams, Jr., Dorsey, Marquart, Windhorst, West & Halladay, Henry E. Halladay, Thomas W. Tinkham, and William E. Martin, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., Curtis D. Forslund, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Jonathan H. Morgan, Sol. Gen., Peter W. Sipkins, Asst. Sol. Gen., St. Paul, Gary Flakne, County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C.J., and OTIS, PETERSON, TODD, and MacLAUGHLIN, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.

PETERSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant Holiday Magic, Inc., and defendants Thomas Solem and James Russell, who are "general distributors" of Holiday Magic products, from a judgment of conviction of operating a multi-level distributorship in violation of Minn.St. 325.79, subd. 2(2)(a). The appeal raises three issues: (1) whether the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad, (2) whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague and indefinite, and (3) whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases