YOUNG v. TEED


79 Misc.2d 235 (1974)

Annette I. Young, Plaintiff, v. Earl J. Teed et al., Defendants. Annette I. Young, Plaintiff, v. Earl J. Teed et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Ulster County

October 8, 1974


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Streifer & Barnovitz for plaintiff. Guernsey, Butts & Walsh for Earl J. Teed, defendant. McCabe & Mack for Frank Pectal, defendant. Scott & Schechtman for Cozi Orchards, Inc., defendant. Schunk & Torraca for William Milano and another, defendants.


JOSEPH F. HAWKINS, J.

There are presented to me for determination in the above two actions no less than 10 motions and cross motions. The three memoranda of law, the several supporting and opposing affidavits are not confined to any particular motion or cross motion but encompass and impinge on others; hence, I deem it preferable that they be considered together than in isolated fashion and their dispositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases