DUKE POWER COMPANY v. LADD

No. 7414SC784.

210 S.E.2d 104 (1974)

24 N.C. App. 83

DUKE POWER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Charles M. LADD and wife, Ineva H. Ladd, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 4, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newsom, Graham, Strayhorn, Hedrick, Murray & Bryson by James L. Newsom and James T. Hedrick, Durham, for petitioner.

Hofler, Mount, White & Long by W. O. King, and R. Hayes Hofler, III, Durham, for respondents.


BRITT, Judge.

By assignments of error 1 and 6, petitioner contends the court erred in permitting Mr. Ladd and his witness Chesson "to testify as to a purchase offer made by Chesson to Ladd after the taking."

We consider first the testimony challenged by assignment #1. On redirect examination, over petitioner's objections, Mr. Ladd testified that he had conversed with others, including his neighbors, about the development of his property, and that in about...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases