1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 38 Cal.App.3d
  5. 38 Cal.App.3d 257 (1974)
 

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PALM DESERT v. BD. OF SUPER.

Docket No. 13214.

38 Cal.App.3d 257 (1974)

113 Cal. Rptr. 328

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PALM DESERT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; EAGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

March 29, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Young, Henrie & McCarthy and John C. McCarthy for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., County Counsel, Gerald J. Geerlings and Tilden L. Brooks, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Samuel O. Pruitt, Jr., Henry S. Zangwill, Carol G. Hammett and Richard G. Duncan, Jr., for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

TAMURA J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying their petition for administrative mandamus to review and set aside actions of defendant Riverside County granting real party in interest (Eagle Development Company, hereafter Eagle) a conditional use permit and variance for the construction of a multiple residential development on a parcel of land in Palm Desert and approving a zone change of the property from restricted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases