FORTUGNO v. FORTUGNO


64 N.J. 220 (1974)

314 A.2d 601

ANTHONY FORTUGNO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ALFRED FORTUGNO, ESTATE OF ADELINE FORTUGNO, DECEASED, AND CONCETTA F. RUBLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS v. ARTHUR FORTUGNO, ANNE F. CAMP, ESTATE OF DANIEL FORTUGNO, DECEASED, AND ESTATE OF SILVIA FORTUGNO, DECEASED, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 5, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Chasan, Leyner, Holland and Tarleton, attorneys.)

Mr. Adrian M. Unger argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys.)


PER CURIAM.

This matter having come before the Court on the cross-petition for certification of plaintiff Anthony Fortugno to review that part of the judgment of the Appellate Division which in effect determined that plaintiff had no legal right to assert a defense of settlement, release and accord and satisfaction to defendants' counterclaim of set-off (which counterclaim was based on the July 18, 1957 order of the trial court that plaintiff pay $68,163.33 to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases