KNOBLE v. WATERFRONT COMM. OF N.Y. HARBOR


132 N.J. Super. 151 (1974)

333 A.2d 22

JOHN J. KNOBLE AND SERGIO INTRONA, APPELLANTS, v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 30, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John P. Croake argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Lum, Biunno and Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. Joseph R. McMahon of counsel).

Mr. Charles J. Harrington, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Irving Malchman and Richard P. Cohen on the brief).

Before Judges LORA, HANDLER and TARLETON.


PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from orders of the Waterfront Commission revoking and denying appellants' licenses as port watchmen (security officer and pier guard). The effective dates of these orders have been stayed by the commission pending disposition of these appeals.

John J. Knoble was a day supervisor, Sergio Introna a night supervisor and Richard H. Roed (not involved in these appeals) a pier guard for McRoberts Protective Agency, Inc., at piers A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases