1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 64 N.J.
  5. 64 N.J. 216 (1974)
 

PHILLIPS v. QUIK-SNAP PRINTING

64 N.J. 216 (1974)

314 A.2d 370

EDWARD J. PHILLIPS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. QUIK-SNAP PRINTING CORP., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 22, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard D. Catenacci argued the cause for appellant (Hughes, McElroy, Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys.)

Mr. Herbert E. Greenstone argued the cause for respondent (Greenstone and Greenstone, attorneys.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Phillips v. Quik-Snap Printing Corp., reported at 126 N.J.Super. 350.

CLIFFORD, J. (dissenting).

The Judge of the Division of Workmen's Compensation dismissed the claim petition and amended petition for failure of the petitioner "to sustain his burden of proof as regards to a compensable occupational...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases