1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 210 S.E.2d
  5. 210 S.E.2d 69 (1974)
 

HEILMAN v. HEILMAN

No. 7410DC772.

210 S.E.2d 69 (1974)

24 N.C. App. 11

Alfred H. HEILMAN v. Mabel W. HEILMAN.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 25, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hatch, Little, Bunn, Jones, Few & Berry by Harold W. Berry, Jr., and Thomas D. Bunn, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Adams, Lancaster, Seay, Rouse & Sherrill by Basil L. Sherrill, Raleigh, for defendant appellee.

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff in this action seeks an absolute divorce, pursuant to G.S. § 50—6, on the ground of one year's separation. Defendant may defeat the action only by affirmatively establishing that the separation was caused by plaintiff's abandoning her. Overby v. Overby, 272 N.C. 636, 158 S.E.2d 799 (1968); Pickens v. Pickens, 258 N.C. 84,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases