1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 22 Ariz.
  5. 22 Ariz. App. 252 (1974)
 

PIERPONT v. HYDRO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

No. 1 CA-CIV 2282.

22 Ariz. App. 252 (1974)

526 P.2d 776

Floyd PIERPONT and Lola Pierpont, his wife, Appellants, v. The HYDRO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., an Arizona corporation, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

Rehearing Denied November 1, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Moore, Phoenix, for appellants.

Neville & Lalliss by Keith R. Lalliss, Phoenix, for appellee.

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing appellee (plaintiff below) to recover on a promissory note executed by appellants (defendants below). Appellants assert a two-pronged attack on the judgment: (1) Application of the doctrine of res judicata barred the suit and (2) appellee, not being the named payee in the note, could not maintain the suit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases