Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, on December 16, 1953. In this proceeding he was charged with professional misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in his office as an attorney, in that he unlawfully promised to give a sum of money to a police officer in an effort to influence him in the performance of his official conduct and that a short time later he gave...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
