The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, on January 28, 1941. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, he was charged with three specifications of misconduct, as follows: (1) as attorney for a decedent's estate he neglected to expeditiously attempt collection on a promissory note, failed to acknowledge requests from heirs as to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.