STATE v. MANAGO

No. 73-755.

38 Ohio St. 2d 223 (1974)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MANAGO, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 12, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Michael E. O'Malley, for appellee.

Mr. James R. Willis, for appellant.


WILLIAM B. BROWN, J.

Appellant urges that the trial court should have directed a verdict of acquittal because the state adduced no evidence tending to prove the requisite elements of the offense charged. Specifically, appellant argues that the record discloses no evidence that her daughter was killed. Thus, the question presented is whether the state established, either directly or circumstantially, by the requisite degree of proof that appellant's daughter was killed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases