1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 24 Ill.
  5. 24 Ill. App.3d 216 (1974)
 

EDELMAN v. LEE OPTICAL CO.

No. 59998.

24 Ill. App.3d 216 (1974)

320 N.E.2d 517

ELEANOR EDELMAN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LEE OPTICAL COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

November 22, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward A. Berman, of Chicago (Schlifkin and Berman, of counsel), for appellants.

Hoffman & Davis, of Chicago (Maurice L. Davis and Alvin L. Kruse, of counsel), for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE DRUCKER delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, individually and as class representatives, filed an amended complaint alleging essentially the use of misleading merchandising techniques by defendants. Defendants moved to strike and dismiss. The court below found that the suit was "not properly maintainable as a class action" and struck the amended complaint, granting leave "to the five named plaintiffs to file an amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases