1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 229 Pa.Super.
  5. 229 Pa.Super. 6 (1974)
 

ROGERS et al. v. HAMMETT

229 Pa.Super. 6 (1974)

Rogers et al., Appellants, v. Hammett.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

June 21, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Sher, with him Marvin W. Factor, and Weinstein & Factor, for appellants.

Malcolm H. Waldron, Jr., with him Barry J. Goldstein, for appellee.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J., June 21, 1974:

The sole issue on appeal is whether the appellants are entitled to a new trial on the basis of an inadequate damage award.

The lower court action arose out of an automobile accident which occurred on January 25, 1964. The appellants herein were plaintiff-passengers in an automobile struck in the rear by the defendant's vehicle. The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, specifically awarding

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases