1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 231 Pa.Super.
  5. 231 Pa.Super. 1 (1974)
 

BELL et ux. v. BENEFICIAL CON. DISC. CO.

231 Pa.Super. 1 (1974)

Bell et ux., Appellants, v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

November 14, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald W. Weaver, with him James F. Israel, and Bagley, Weaver & Sydor, for appellants.

J. Tomlinson Fort, with him Robert L. Potter, and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellee.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION PER CURIAM, November 14, 1974:

Appeal quashed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY SPAETH, J., January 13, 1975:

The question presented by this appeal is whether an order dismissing a class action is interlocutory or final. The majority of the court has ordered the appeal quashed, and has denied a petition to reconsider its order, without explanatory opinion. I regret and respectfully dissent from this action. My reasons may be summarized as follows:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases