ARNSTEEN v. U. S. EQUIPMENT CO.

Docket No. 13047.

52 Mich. App. 177 (1974)

217 N.W.2d 61

ARNSTEEN v. U.S. EQUIPMENT COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 26, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey, Kruse and Westen (by James N. Martin), for plaintiffs.

Cross, Wrock, Miller & Vieson, by W. Robert Chandler (Laurence S. Schultz, of counsel), for defendant.

Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and O'HARA, JJ.


O'HARA, J.

The parties to this action are before us again by order of the Supreme Court. This Court had granted appellees' motion to affirm. The Supreme Court reversed and instructively pointed out to us in its order the difference between the claim that a jury verdict or judge's decision is against the great weight of evidence and a claim that there is insufficient evidence to support a verdict or decision. Additionally, the Supreme Court noted how...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases