MATTER OF HIRSCHFELD v. FEUER


35 N.Y.2d 176 (1974)

In the Matter of Abraham Hirschfeld, Appellant, v. Herbert Feuer et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Ramsey Clark et al., Respondents, and Howard Samuels et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided August 28, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Hirschhorn for appellant.

Adrian P. Burke, Corporation Counsel (Irwin L. Herzog and William P. DeWitt of counsel), for New York City Board of Elections, respondent.

Stephen Gillers for Ramsey Clark, respondent.

Charles B. Ortner for intervenors-respondents.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STALEY concur in Per Curiam opinion.


Per Curiam.

Appellant argues that the provision of subdivision 7 of section 242-a of the Election Law mandating rotation of the order of names of candidates on the ballot in New York City primary elections extends only to elections for offices whose geographical jurisdiction is exclusively within the corporate limits of the City of New York. If this interpretation of the statute were adopted, the rotation requirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases