RUTTER v. KING

Docket No. 17881.

57 Mich. App. 152 (1974)

226 N.W.2d 79

RUTTER v. KING

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 5, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson, Carr, Street & Hornbach, for plaintiffs.

Schmidt, Heaney, Howlett & Van't Hof (by Richard L. Spindle and Robert D. Kullgren), for garnishee-defendant Wolverine Insurance Company.

Before: ALLEN, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and R.L. SMITH, JJ.


ALLEN, J.

This case raises the issue of first impression in Michigan of whether a successful judgment creditor plaintiff in a prior suit may proceed directly by garnishment against defendant's insurer for the excess amount of the judgment over and above the policy limits. The trial court held not, and plaintiffs appeal. Subordinate questions of first impression are also included.

In 1972, plaintiff Pauline Rutter received a $30,000 jury verdict for personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases