1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 506 F.2d
  5. 506 F.2d 1261 (1974)
 

ESTATE OF LE BARON v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY

No. 74-1351.

506 F.2d 1261 (1974)

ESTATE of William LE BARON, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, and Monsanto Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 1, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence E. Alioto (argued), of the Law Offices of Joseph L. Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard J. MacLaury (argued), of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This private treble damage anti-trust action is here for the second time. See Estate of Le Baron, Sr., et al. v. Rohm and Haas Company and Monsanto Company, 441 F.2d 575 (9th Cir. 1971). The issue presented is a further evolvement of the evidentiary question addressed in the first appeal.1

In accordance with the directions given in our prior opinion, the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases