1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 519 P.2d
  5. 519 P.2d 1185 (1974)
 

STATE v. BARELA

No. 1256.

519 P.2d 1185 (1974)

86 N.M. 104

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Frances BARELA, a/k/a Frances Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

February 20, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Wells, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Agustin T. Gurule, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of distributing heroin. Section 54-11-20, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, 1973 Supp.) She appeals. We reverse.

Defendant contends: (1) The deposition of Dr. Robert G. Schoenfeld was inadmissible at trial under Rule 29(n) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure. (2) There was insufficient evidence to support the conviction.

(1) The deposition was inadmissible at trial.

On the morning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases