N. L. R. B. v. LUNDAY-THAGARD OIL CO.

No. 73-2176.

496 F.2d 1195 (1974)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LUNDAY-THAGARD OIL COMPANY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 19, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph E. Mayer (argued), R. Bruce McLean, Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Robert M. Lieber (argued), Littler, Mendelson & Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

George A. Pappy, of Brundage, Neyhart, Miller, Reich & Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., for charging party.

Before ELY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The record does not support the respondent's contention that it was deprived of significant procedural rights. See the Board's Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.69(c) (1973); see also NLRB v. Singleton Packing Corp., 418 F.2d 275, 280 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824, 91 S.Ct. 47, 27 L.Ed. 2d 53 (1970); Sonoco Products Co. v. NLRB, 399 F.2d 835

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases