1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 503 F.2d
  5. 503 F.2d 1131 (1974)
 

VAN HOOMISSEN v. XEROX CORPORATION

No. 74-1037.

503 F.2d 1131 (1974)

Dave VAN HOOMISSEN, Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. XEROX CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied November 6, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlos G. Ynostroza, E. E. O. C., San Francisco, Cal., Beatrice Rosenberg, Charles L. Reischel, James P. Scanlan, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-intervenor-appellant.

Richard Haas of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing En Banc Denied November 6, 1974.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Van Hoomissen sued Xerox, his former employer, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)], alleging that Xerox fired him and engaged in other acts of retaliation because of his efforts to recruit minorities. The Equal Opportunity Commission sought leave to intervene under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) (1) and Fed.R.Civ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases