1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 496 F.2d
  5. 496 F.2d 1138 (1974)
 

MARIASH v. MORRILL

No. 889, Docket 73-2587.

496 F.2d 1138 (1974)

Irving MARIASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles MORRILL and Bernard Berwick, Defendants, and David R. Pokross et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided May 10, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Mariash (Harry H. Lipsig, New York City, on the brief), plaintiff-appellant pro se.

Frederick A. Nicoll, New York City (Rogers Hoge & Hills, New York City, on the brief; W. Hubert Plummer, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, CLARK, Associate Justice, and SMITH, Circuit Judge.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:

Although the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1934 Act]1 is hardly a model of precision, the statute does speak with atypical clarity in authorizing nationwide service of process.2 We thus find erroneous the district court's dismissal of this complaint, alleging in substance a violation of Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases