Per Curiam.
Petitioner, it appears, failed to designate in the caption of this proceeding the name of a "subtenant" in actual occupancy of the subject premises, to wit, H. Richard Moore, as a party respondent. Instead, petitioner designated such respondent as "John Doe". The court below, relying on CPLR 1024, held, in effect, that this defect was nonamendable as the allegations of the petition clearly name H. Richard Moore as an occupant of the premises and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.