AUSTIN v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

No. 73-2704.

504 F.2d 1033 (1974)

Franklin J. AUSTIN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 21, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Warren Siegel (argued), Alhambra, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Philip S. Malinsky, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.


OPINION

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

The issue on appeal is whether the appellees, who are veterans reinstated by their employer, Sears, Roebuck and Company ("Sears"), are entitled to vacation benefits in the year of their return from the service, under the provisions of the Selective Service Act of 1967 and the terms of Sears' collective bargaining agreement. Relying on our decision in Locaynia v. American Airlines, Inc. (9th Cir. 1972) 457...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases